Literature and Society

Essay | F. R. Leavis

Evaluate F. R. Leavis as a literary critic.

Premium

Evaluate F. R. Leavis as a literary critic. [2021, 2016] ✪✪✪

Frank Raymond Leavis (1895–1978) was one of the most influential English literary critics of the 20th century. He was deeply influenced by T.S. Eliot (188-1965) and shared some ideas with the New Critics. But his criticism was broader and more humanistic. Leavis believed that literature and society are deeply connected. For him, literary criticism was not just a study of form or beauty but a moral and cultural activity. Let us evaluate him as a literary critic.

Leavis and the Nature of Criticism: Leavis saw literary criticism as a serious and moral activity. His aim was not only to analyze style or structure but also to explore the “quality of life” a work presents. He said, criticism should keep alive the human tradition and moral awareness. Like the New Critics, he valued close reading, but unlike them, he linked literature with real human experience. For him, the critic’s duty was to find in literature an “art of civilized living.” He always tried to protect moral and cultural standard

s in an age of industrialism and mass culture.

Influence of Eliot and Rejection of Romanticism: Leavis was greatly influenced by T.S. Eliot, especially his idea of “Tradition and the Individual Talent.” He opposed the Romantic belief in private inspiration and isolated genius. As he said, 

“We are apt to be under the influence of ideas and attitudes until rejected.” 

This line shows his rejection of the Romantic faith in emotion and inspiration. Like Eliot, Leavis believed that a writer must work within a living tradition. 

Balance between Individual and Society: Leavis believed that literature serves as the meeting point between individual talent and social culture. He said, 

“Without the individual talent there is no creation.” 

Yet he also added, 

“It is only in individuals that society lives.” 

These lines show his balanced view. For him, the individual and society depend on each other. Literature originates from a person’s imagination, but their social life shapes that imagination. He criticized both Marxists and Romantics.

Idea of Cultural Health: Leavis judged literature by its relation to cultural health. He said, 

“What is the best conceivable public?” 

This question shows his concern for the link between writers and readers. A healthy society should give its writers a good audience. He admired Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s Progress as a model of cultural balance between popular and refined taste. He also praised Cecil Sharp’s study of English Folk Songs as proof that even ordinary people can have a deep culture. 

Critic of Modern Civilization: Leavis was deeply worried about modern mechanical civilization. He said, 

“No one seriously interested in modern literature can feel that it represents a satisfactory cultural order.” 

He thought industrialism and mass culture had destroyed the moral unity of society. Literature had lost touch with common life. Great writers like Shakespeare and Bunyan were close to their culture, but modern writers were isolated. Leavis wanted critics and teachers to restore this lost connection through serious study and value judgment.

In summary, F.R. Leavis remains one of the most respected names in English criticism. He joined the moral vision of Matthew Arnold with the technical insight of T.S. Eliot. He believed that literature and society exist together and that criticism must guard moral and cultural life. His work reminds readers that literature is not just for pleasure but for deep human understanding. 

Continue Reading

Subscribe to access the full content

Upgrade to Premium
From this writer
F
F. R. Leavis
Literary Writer