George Herbert

Poetry | George Herbert

Write a note on Herbert's use of metaphysical conceits.

Premium

Comment on Herbert’s use of metaphysical conceits.

[For DU 7 College mainly]

George Herbert (1593-1633) is one of the most important metaphysical poets of English literature. His poetry is religious, but it is also very personal and thoughtful. One special feature of his poetry is the use of metaphysical conceits. A conceit is a clever and unusual comparison. His conceits help readers understand God, faith, suffering, and human life in an easy and interesting way.

Metaphysical Conceit: A metaphysical conceit is a comparison between two very different things. It may look strange at first, but it carries deep meaning. Metaphysical poets use logic, imagination, and intellect in their conceits.

Herbert’s conceits are not just clever. They are sincere and spiritual. He uses them to explain the relationship between God and man. His comparisons often come from daily life, nature, or simple objects. Through these conceits, religious ideas become clear and living.

The Shape Conceit in Easter Wings: One of Herbert’s most famous conceits is found in “Easte

r Wings.” In this poem, the poem itself is shaped like wings on the page. This shape is not for decoration. It carries meaning. The poem talks about man’s fall through sin and his rise through God’s grace. The lines become shorter to show man’s fall and weakness. Then they grow longer to show spiritual rise. The wing shape becomes a visual conceit.

Herbert compares the soul to a bird. He writes:

 “O let me rise

As larks, harmoniously,”

With God’s help, the weak soul can fly upward. This conceit makes a deep religious idea very easy to understand. The reader can see and feel the meaning.

The Collar: In “The Collar,” Herbert uses the conceit of a collar to show discipline and control. Priests wear a white collar. But the collar is also worn by animals like dogs. Like a dog’s collar, the priest’s collar is a symbol of being controlled. Here, Herbert compares the speaker’s religious life to a collar. This collar tells us that the speaker’s life is controlled by his religious duties. He wants freedom. This is why he hits the table and says he will go out.

“I struck the board, and cried, "No more;

I will abroad!”

Cage and Rope: In “The Collar,” Herbert also uses the conceits of a rope and a cage. The image of a “cage” is a strong metaphysical conceit. The speaker compares his religious life to a cage. It means he feels trapped. He wants to live freely. The “rope of sands” is another metaphysical conceit. A rope made of sand is a weak or false thing. It cannot hold anything. He starts to convince himself that his faith is just a false “cage” he has built for himself from his own false “thoughts.” So, he wants to leave this cage. He wants to break free of the false rope. As he says:

“Forsake thy cage,

Thy rope of sands.”

These conceits help us understand his mental struggle.

The Pulley: In “The Pulley,” the entire poem is built on one strong conceit. God is compared to a man using a pulley. God gives man many gifts, such as strength, beauty, wisdom, and pleasure, pouring from a cup of blessings. But God keeps back one gift: rest. “Rest” lies at the bottom of the cup.

“Rest in the bottom lay.”

This is the central idea of the conceit. “Rest” works as God’s pulley. Just like a pulley pulls something upward, restlessness pulls man towards God. This conceit explains why humans are never fully satisfied in the world. It is a very clever but simple way to explain a deep religious truth.

Simple and Deep: Herbert’s conceits are special because they are simple. He uses wings, collars, pulleys, ropes, and cages. These are everyday things. But through them, he explains faith, suffering, obedience, and love. His conceits do not confuse the reader. Instead, they guide the reader gently towards understanding God.

In conclusion, George Herbert’s use of metaphysical conceits is sincere, simple, and meaningful. His conceits are not used to show cleverness only. They are used to explain deep religious ideas in an easy way. This is why Herbert remains a great metaphysical poet.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to access the full content

Upgrade to Premium