An Apology for Poetry

Essay | Philip Sidney

How Does Sidney Establish the Poet's Superiority Over Philosophers and Historians?

Premium

How does Sidney establish the poet's superiority over Philosophers and Historians?

Or, How, according to Sidney, is the poet similar to and different from the philosopher?

Or, How does Sidney establish the superiority of poetry over Philosophy and History?  

In “An Apology for Poetry (1595),” Sir Philip Sidney (1554-1586) argues that poetry is superior to philosophy and history. He believes poetry teaches morality better than these subjects. While philosophy gives rules but no examples, history gives examples but no clear lessons. Poetry combines both. It teaches through stories that inspire people. Sidney says poetry touches the heart. It makes learning enjoyable and effective. Below are five key reasons why Sidney thinks poetry is better than philosophy and history.

Poetry Over Philosophy: Sidney says philosophy teaches good things. But it uses hard and complex words. Most people do not understand it. Philosophers give advice and rules, but they do not show real-life examples. It is evident in the following

quote.

“For conclusion, I say the philosopher teaches, but he teaches obscurely, so as the learned only can understand him, that is to say, he teaches that are already taught.”

That is why their teaching does not touch people deeply. People may listen, but forget it quickly. Sidney says poetry is better because it teaches the same good ideas in an easy way. It uses stories that everyone can understand and remember. For example, reading about Aeneas’s loyalty teaches better than a philosophy lecture. Even children learn from fables like The Tortoise and the Hare. Philosophy only speaks to the wise, but poetry speaks to everyone.

Clearer Lessons Than History: History tells true events, but mixes good and bad examples. It shows that evil people succeed and good people suffer. This confuses readers about right and wrong. Poetry, however, creates ideal examples. Like Sidney, Aristotle also makes poetry superior to history through these words: 

“Poetry, therefore, is … a higher thing than history: for poetry tends to express the universal, history the particular.”

Sidney jokes that history is a “prisoner of truth,” while poetry shows “perfect truth.” Stories like King David and Nathan teach guilt and repentance better than historical facts.

Teaching with Pleasure: Philosophy is serious and often boring. History can be dry with too many facts. But poetry makes learning enjoyable. Like sweet food hiding medicine, poetry hides lessons in beautiful stories. Jesus taught through parables, not lectures. Sidney says people remember poetic lessons longer because they are fun. Songs, dramas, and epics all teach while entertaining. This makes poetry more effective than plain facts or rules.

Superior Creativity and Ideals: History is limited to real events, and philosophy is limited to theories. But poetry creates perfect worlds. Poets imagine ideal heroes, love, and justice, and the things real life lacks. The line below contains this idea ideally.

“That imitation whereof poetry is, has the most conveniency to nature of all other;”

For example, Homer’s Achilles teaches bravery better than any real soldier. Sidney calls poets “makers” because they improve nature. While history shows flaws, poetry shows how life should be. This creativity makes poetry a better guide for life.

Based on the above discussion, Sidney proves that poetry is better than both philosophy and history. Philosophy is hard to follow, and history does not always teach clear lessons. Poetry is simple, powerful, and full of imagination. It teaches good values in a sweet and easy way. It helps people understand and feel at the same time. Poetry does not just speak to the brain; it speaks to the heart, too. That is why Sidney calls poetry the best teacher of all.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to access the full content

Upgrade to Premium
From this writer
P
Philip Sidney
Literary Writer
More Topics