Literature and Society

Essay | F. R. Leavis

Evaluate Leavis' objections against the Wordsworthian theory of poetry

Premium

Evaluate Leavis objections against the Wordsworthian theory of poetry F R Leavis - is a well-known twentieth-century critic In his essay Literature and Society he examines the works of English writers of different ages to illustrate the rise and fall of a true cultural spirit Leavis admired moral seriousness and artistic balance in literature He objected to the Wordsworthian theory of poetry because it was too narrow and individual Wordsworth - transformed poetry into a private emotion It was detached from society and its vibrant culture Wordsworth s Isolation from Social Life Leavis thought Wordsworth s poetry came from a withdrawn and private world He said Wordsworth s interest in rustic life was something external to the world he belonged to and remote from it This means Wordsworth observed rural life from outside not as a living part of it His sympathy for the poor was genuine But it lacked

genuine engagement with social culture Leavis believed that poetry must grow from the shared life and traditions of a people rather than from personal feelings alone Rejection of Individualism Leavis rejected Wordsworth s over-emphasis on individual emotion and personal inspiration He said Without the individual talent there is no creation but he also added It is only in individuals that society lives These two lines show his balanced view He did not deny personal genius but believed that the poet s talent must express collective human experience Wordsworth s poetry full of personal emotion and nature worship missed this social link Contrast with Augustan and Romantic Traditions Leavis compared the Augustan and Romantic periods to show how Wordsworth s age lacked cultural unity The Augustans like Pope and Addison portrayed man as a social being but they lost their originality Leavis wrote Such insistence on the social has a discouraging effect on originality So the Romantics reacted too strongly and turned away from society Blake and Wordsworth went to the other extreme and celebrated the individual Leavis objected because both movements lost balance A good poet should stand between social order and personal freedom Decline of Popular Culture Leavis believed that Wordsworth failed to connect poetry with the real life of people He admired Bunyan s The Pilgrim s Progress because A humane masterpiece resulted because he belonged to the civilization of his time Unlike Wordsworth Bunyan s writing came from the heart of his society and spoke the language of his people Wordsworth s poetry showed love for rustic life but his view was romantic and idealized He did not belong to a living traditional culture After his death Leavis noted that the traditional culture of the people had almost completely disappeared Need for Cultural and Moral Balance Leavis wanted poetry to express both the individual spirit and the cultural health of society He asked What is the best conceivable public This question reveals his conviction that poetry should serve a community that appreciates and values art Wordsworth had no such public connection His poems though sincere were personal meditations not social expressions Leavis believed that literature loses vitality when it ignores moral and cultural balance True art must unite personal vision with the collective wisdom of civilization In summary Leavis s objections to the Wordsworthian theory of poetry came from his belief in the union of the individual and society Wordsworth made poetry too private and emotional Leavis admired writers like Bunyan who joined popular and refined culture in one voice For him poetry must be both personal and social Only then can literature truly reflect the entirety of human life and preserve the moral spirit of civilization

Continue Reading

Sign in and subscribe to unlock the full content

From this writer
F
F. R. Leavis
Literary Writer