An Apology for Poetry

Essay | Philip Sidney

What are Sidney's views on contemporary English drama?

Premium

What are Sidney's views on contemporary English drama?

Sir Philip Sidney (1554-1586) was a famous poet and critic in the 16th century. In his book “An Apology for Poetry” (1595), he shares his thoughts about poetry and drama. He respected poetry very much. But he was not happy with the English drama of his time. Sidney thought that many English plays were poorly written. He believed that drama should follow some classical rules. He wanted drama to teach good values and be well-organised. He felt many modern English plays failed to do this.

Breaking of Rules: Sidney was upset because many English dramas broke classical rules. Good plays should follow the “Three Unities”: unity of time, place, and action. But English plays ignored this. A single play might show events across years and countries. Sidney thought this was unrealistic and messy. For example, a character might be a child in one scene and old in the next. This made the story hard to follow.

Sidney wanted drama to be more disciplined, like ancient Greek plays.

Mixing of Characters: Sidney dislikes how English plays mix kings with clowns. In classical drama, tragedies were serious, and comedies were funny. They were kept separate. But English plays often combined both. According to the author, a play should be pure comedy or tragedy. He says,

“The ideal tragedy is an imitation of the noble action in the representation of which it stirs, admiration and commiseration.”

Sidney says mixing characters is confusing. For example, a play might show a noble king in one scene and a silly jester in the next. This weakened the play’s moral lesson. Sidney believed drama should either teach seriously or entertain lightly, not both at once.

Lack of Moral Purpose: Sidney believed drama should teach goodness. But many English plays failed here. Some showed evil characters succeeding without punishment. Others made foolish behavior seem funny without teaching a lesson. About this, the author says,

“Delight hath a joy in it, either permanent or present. 

Laughter hath only a scornful teaching.”

Sidney wanted drama to inspire people to be better, like Greek tragedies did. He thought plays should clearly show the difference between right and wrong.

Bad Use of Language: Another problem Sidney saw was the use of big or strange words. Some writers used difficult language just to sound clever. Their plays had words that were too fancy or did not match the character. He admired poets like Chaucer, who wrote clearly and beautifully. For Sidney, good drama should focus on moral lessons, not just show off fancy words.

Hope for Improvement: Although Sidney criticised English drama, he did not hate it completely. He believed that English had the power to create great plays. He praised older poets like Chaucer and believed that with care, drama could improve. He wanted writers to learn from classical examples and write plays that were both beautiful and meaningful. He hoped that English drama would become noble and respected again if writers followed the right rules.

To wrap up, Sidney wanted English drama to be better. He criticised it because he loved it and saw its potential. He believed drama should follow rules, teach good values, and use clear language. The dramas of his time, in his view, were full of mistakes. But he did not give up hope. He wanted writers to improve and make drama that could guide people. Sidney’s ideas remind us that art should not only entertain, but also teach and inspire.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to access the full content

Upgrade to Premium
From this writer
P
Philip Sidney
Literary Writer
More Topics