The Study of Poetry

Essay | Matthew Arnold

What are the different estimates enunciated by Arnold?

Premium

What are the different estimates enunciated by Arnold NU Matthew Arnold published The Study of Poetry in In this essay he explained how readers judge poetry He described three kinds of estimates Among them only one is correct and useful The others often cause wrong judgment Real Estimate Arnold called this the only true estimate It judges poetry by real value It looks for deep beauty and excellence It gives joy and helps compare poets fairly This estimate shows if a poet is truly classic It avoids outside influence and personal emotion Arnold says Our estimate of poetry should be governed by the real estimate based on the presence or absence of high poetic quality Historic Estimate This estimate comes from a poet s past glory It values poetry for its old place in history Arnold said this is a natural but wrong method It makes readers overrate old poets

History should not hide real poetic power True art must stand alone Personal Estimate This estimate comes from personal likes and habits It affects how we judge modern poets Arnold said our feelings can mislead us We may praise weak poetry because we like it So this estimate gives a false sense of value The author claims this method to be faulty in the following quote two other kinds of estimate the historic estimate and the personal estimate both of which are fallacious In the final Arnold warned against historic and personal estimates He asked readers to follow the real estimate only It helps find true excellence in poetry By using this readers can judge fairly and wisely This is the way to understand great poetry

Continue Reading

Sign in and subscribe to unlock the full content