is she a mere victim?
Henrik Ibsen’s (1828-1906) “A Doll’s House,” published in 1879, portrays Nora Helmer as a woman trapped in a deeply patriarchal society that denies her independence and identity. While Nora makes decisions that lead to her suffering, these choices are not entirely her own. She is more of a victim than an agent of her suffering.
Nora as a Victim of Society: Nora’s primary struggle stems from being a woman in a patriarchal society that restricts her rights and freedoms. She is denied the ability to make financial decisions. This forces her to forge her father’s signature to borrow money so that she can save her husband, Torvald. However, Krogstad reminds her,
“The law cares nothing about motives.”
This reflects the rigid societal norms that condemn her actions without considering her intentions. Nora’s suffering is rooted in a legal system that disregards women’s autonomy. This fact makes her a victim of societal injustice.
Additionally, societal expectations confine Nora to the role of a submissive wife and mother. Torvald treats her as a possession rather than a partner, calling her “my little skylark” and “my squirrel.” These terms may seem affectionate, but they reinforce the idea that Nora is a decorative, dependent figure in Torvald’s life. Her role as a “doll-wife” leaves her with no opportunity to grow or express her individuality. She later realizes,
“I have been your doll-wife, just as at home I was Papa’s doll-child.”
This revelation highlights how society has conditioned her to prioritize pleasing others over her own needs.
Nora as a Victim of Her Relationships: Nora’s suffering is also caused by the men in her life. Her father treated her like a child, never allowing her to form her own opinions. She tells Torvald,
“Being with Torvald is a little like being with Papa.”
This upbringing conditioned Nora to accept a life of dependence and obedience. Torvald’s hypocritical and controlling nature further victimizes Nora. While he expects her to sacrifice for him, he is unwilling to do the same for her. When her secret is revealed, he berates her, saying,
“Do you understand now what it is you have done for me?”
Torvald’s focus on his reputation rather than Nora’s sacrifice exposes his selfishness and lack of genuine love. Even after he forgives her, it is clear that he sees her as a possession rather than an equal.
Nora as a Victim of Circumstances: Nora’s lack of self-awareness and independence is not her fault but a result of societal conditioning. She lives in a world where women are expected to obey men and where breaking these norms leads to isolation and condemnation. Her decision to forge her father’s signature, though illegal, was an act of desperation caused by her limited options. Krogstad’s blackmail and Torvald’s betrayal leave her with no support system. It forces her to leave her family to seek independence. She declares:
“I am going to see if I can make out who is right, the world or I.”
In conclusion, Nora Helmer is more a victim than an agent of her suffering. Her choices are dictated by the constraints of a patriarchal society, her relationships, and the expectations imposed on her as a woman. Nora’s realization of her victimhood drives her decision to leave her husband and children. Her journey toward self-discovery underscores the profound injustices she has endured.
Continue Reading
Subscribe to access the full content
Upgrade to Premium